-
"If you love films and care about filmmakers, you'll have a hard time putting this book down. These lively conversations reveal just how much one generation of filmmakers influences the next - and how a single movie can change the course of a young person's life and career."
-Leonard Maltin, author of Leanord Martin's Movie Guide -
"A great and provocative read. Elder begins with a simple question and leads a wide variety of filmmakers down all sorts of unexpected paths. Why do we respond so passionately, even irrationally, to the movies that change our lives? The wonderful thing about being a critic or a lifelong movie lover is that life changes all the time in relation to the spells being cast on the screen. Elder's book honors that alchemic relationship many times over. It's addictive."
-Michael Phillips, film critic, Chicago Tribune
Guy Maddin on L’âge d’or:
“I’d always been pretty secular, and I kind of bought it. It always seemed like fair game to kind of scalp the church somehow. It just seemed kind of quaint that the savagery of Buñuel’s attack always seemed kind of charmingly distanced for me because I’d already made quite a happy secular space for myself—that it felt a bit like looking at a picture book of World War I, or something. There was so much time and space between me and it that I just saw it as something that must have been pretty important to the artist.”
Michel Gondry on Le voyage en Ballon:
“It’s not an intentional dreamlike quality—there’s a little something and you can’t really point to it. It’s a combination of things. The way they shoot only in good weather. I think that when you shoot with a helicopter you can really move quickly, and even when it becomes cloudy you can really target the area that was sunny and go there. It’s sort of like French movies in the ’60s because they could afford to wait for the good weather.” Manny people like to watch this type of movies at home with their family, some even get a big tv for this and a 55 inch tv stand with mount to do it comfortably.
Michael Polish on Once Upon a Time in America:
“I think European films, in a way, are considered genre because they’re shipped to us. They seem to love the exotic thriller, and we repackage it with exotic stars.”
Danny Boyle on Apocalypse Now:
“The whole point of the experience of this film is that you trust the madness that Coppola was in while editing it. And supposedly, he was literally holding editors ransom at the end, forcing them to try things. And from a cool, rational perspective, you would think, “Surely it’s a good idea to let Francis have a relook at a film and think how he might want to change things.” But no, the whole point about it, when you see it, when you see it at the end of—what was it?—a three- to four-year journey to make it, that’s what you see. What you don’t want to see is a reexamination of it from a more leisurely perspective. The fact that it’s edited from inside the storm, that’s where you want to see it edited from. You don’t want to see it edited in a proper, rational, professional way. You want to see it edited by someone who is insane or going insane.